Setback for Elon Musk: Justice accepted a request from Twitter and the trial already has a start date

Setback for Elon Musk: Justice accepted a request from Twitter and the trial already has a start date
1658425561 setback for elon musk justice accepted a request from twitter.jpg
Elon Musk (REUTERS/Brendan McDermid)

Elon Musk lost a fight to delay Twitter’s lawsuit against him when a Delaware judge on Tuesday set a trial for October, citing the “cloud of uncertainty.” about the social media company after the billionaire backed out of a deal to buy it.

“Delay threatens irreparable harm,” he said. Kathaleen St. Jude McCormickchief judge of the Delaware Court of Chancery, who handles many high-profile business disputes. “The longer the delay, the higher the risk.”

“The reality is that the delay threatens irreparable harm to sellers,” he said, referring to Twitter.

He asked the parties to prepare the trial schedule, which he set at five days. Musk requested a two-week trial in February, and Twitter requested a four-day trial.

Twitter had asked for an accelerated trial in September, while Musk’s team asked to wait until early next year due to the complexity of the case. McCormick said Musk’s team underestimated the Delaware court’s ability to “quickly process complex litigation.”

Twitter is trying to force the billionaire to make good on his April promise to buy the social media giant for $44 billion. and the company wants it to happen quickly because it says the ongoing dispute is hurting its business.

Musk, the world’s richest man, agreed to pay $54.20 per Twitter share, but now he wants to back out of the deal.

Twitter sued Elon Musk on Tuesday for breaching the company
Twitter sued Elon Musk on Tuesday for breaching the company’s $44 billion purchase contract, calling the tycoon’s strategy a “model of hypocrisy,” according to court documents.

“It is an attempted sabotage. He’s doing everything he can to take down Twitter.” said attorney William Savitt, who is representing Twitter in the Delaware Court of Chancery before the court’s chancellor, Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick. The hearing was held virtually after McCormick said she tested positive for COVID-19.

Musk has claimed that the company has not provided adequate information about the number of fake Twitter accounts or “spam bot” and that it has breached its obligations under the agreement by firing senior managers and laying off a significant number of employees.

Savitt said that the contested merger deal and Musk’s tweets disparaging the company were hurting business and questioned Musk’s request to delay the trial, asking “if the real plan is to run out time.”

“He’s betting on getting out of the deal he signed,” Savitt said.

But the idea that the CEO of Tesla is trying to hurt Twitter is “absurd. He has no interest in harming the company.” said Musk’s attorney, Andrew Rossman, noting that he is Twitter’s second-largest shareholder with a stake far larger than that of the entire board.

Savitt stressed the importance of an accelerated test starting in September so that Twitter can make important business decisions that affect everything from employee retention to vendor and customer relationships.

Rossman said more time is needed because is “one of the largest private deals in history” involving a “company that has a lot of data that needs to be analyzed. Billions of shares need to be analyzed on their platform.”

(With information from AP and Reuters)

Keep reading: